A demonstration in the federal court in Denver can help shape the future legal landscape around the nationwide exile.
A high-handing hearing ended on Monday morning in a case filed by the rights groups of immigrants against the Trump administration. The administration lawyers argued that a 24 -hour notice should be allotted to the people facing exile so that the courts are able to fight their exile order, but the ACLU and Rocky Mountains for the immigrant advocacy network argued that 24 -hour is “not appropriate,” As ordered by the US Supreme Court,
Tim McDonald, a legal director of ACLU, Colorado on Monday, Alfred A. Arj told CBS News Colorado outside the US Courthouse, “The government wants to give the least notice as much as possible so that they can get people out of the country without a judge.”
“The idea that 24 hours is enough for someone who has been detained in the Arora Detention Facility, who probably does not speak English, who cannot have a high level of education, who does not have a lawyer who does not have access to the phone – the considering that the person can file a retriever in 24 hours.”
CBS
McDonald said that allegedly stated Nazis were given more rights In the court after World War II compared to Venezuela, which faced exile under the Trump administration, the appeal by a judge of a US appeal court in Washington, DC last month resonating.
American District Judge Charlotte Sweeny for Colorado district said on Monday that it would not rule the matter for 24 hours. During that hearing, lawyers from ACLU and Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network said that 11 people have been deported from Colorado to Al Salvador and about 85% of the people to be held at the Arora Ice Processing Center are not yet able to maintain the legal lawyer, which are argued that those groups argued, their fixed process rights.
The court records show that the hearing lasted for more than an hour. Apart from President Trump, the defendants named in the case include US Attorney General Palm Bandy, Secretary of Homeland Security Christie NoM, ICE Director Todd Leone, State Marco Rubio Secretary, Robert Gaudian, Director of Ice Denver Field Office, and Warden of Ice Processing Center in Don Seja, Aurora.
AP 
The US Supreme Court issued a rare weekend, in which the Trump administration’s plan was passed in a war -time law 1798 to exist in the Warnezuela migrants to temporarily stop, in 1798, Foreign enemy act,
Came as a decision Large scale protests continued across the country Condemning the immigration policies of Trump administration. The administration is urging the court to reconsider its decision.
The President has called for the Alien Enemy Act, allowing the Executive Branch to detain or deport the nonsense that considers it “dangerous”. Last month, the administration used the law to send more than 200 migrants. Jail in El Salvador,
Now, the president of Al Salvador has proposed to exchange migrants deported for political prisoners held in Venezuela.
In Denver, a federal court Recently prohibited removal of any nonsense inside Colorado Those who are under or will be under the Foreign Enemy Act. Some of the already deported people from Colorado have been sent to Al Salvador Jail, according to their lawyers.
On the issue, what kind of legal rights migrants have to challenge the government’s allegations before being removed from the US
Trump has stated that the United States is facing a “attack” by the train de Argua gang and the right to use the 1798 law. The Act was last included in Colorado during World War II, in which Japanese Americans were included in the International Camp Camp,
“If you think of an intern camp during World War II in the United States, this is the kind of structure we are using the law that how this law is used in the past,” said an immigrant advocate Laura Lunon with Rocky Mountain Immigrant AdvocCC network.
CBS 
The legal battle has triggered a series of emergency filing over the weekend, when the Supreme Court collided with a case out of the US district court for Washington, DC, saying that it needs to be filed in Texas and other states from where people are being deported.
When asked about the case that McDonald said, “If the government can remove these people without any process, it erases civil freedom for each of us, and they can be ahead. We can be ahead. If the government is capable of removing with proper process, it is a risk of freedom for all of us.”
