Thousands of government scientists and researchers face dismissal threat under Trump’s federal workforce plan

Trump administration Thousands of scientists and researchers in the US federal government intend, including significant cuts Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as the MLAs warned on Tuesday.
The rejected EPA will be generated, an agency that carries pollution, clean water and handle Climate change issuesDissolving its scientific research division, which currently employs over 1,500 employees.
Documents investigated by Democratic members of the American House Committee on science, space and technology indicated that most employees would not be “maintained”, while the remaining roles would be revived within other agency departments, as reported by the AFP.
These proposed excesses, although not yet confirmed, will proceed with the aim of reducing government spending by reducing the federal employment of President Donald Trump and reduce the environment and reduce the environment and Public health rules,
Trump said in February that EPA administrator Lee Zeldin, his elected agency leader, intends to reduce about 65 percent of the 17,000 employees of the agency.
Regarding the proposed deduction, EPA spokesman Molly Waseliu said the agency “is taking exciting steps because we enter the next stage of organizational reform.” “We are committed to enhancing our ability to give clean air, water and land for all Americans,” Waseliu said. “While no decisions have been taken yet, we are actively listening to employees at all levels how to gather ideas about increasing efficiency and ensure that the EPA is as usual up-to-date and effective.”
EPA’s intention to abolish the research office staged a protest against Democratic MLAs. “Every decision of EPA should be to protect human health and environment, and that EPA should be to protect human health and environment, and that if you bridge EPA science, it cannot happen.”
“Last time, Trump and his chronies have politicized and distorted science … Now, it is their attempt to kill it for good” Loofgrain said, seeing that “EPA could not” use its legal obligation to use the best available science “without researchers. ,
A non-profit advocacy organization, The Union of Junior Scientist (UCS) highlighted the importance of the affected employees in the main mission of the EPA. Chitra Kumar, managing director of UCS of Climate and Energy, said, “Scientists and experts of this office reviewed the best available sciences to regulate dangerous chemicals to determine the boundary on pollution and keep public safe.” “The administration knows, and shows history, this industry will not regulate itself.”