In the Waning months of the Biden administration, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB issued a striking of the new consumer protection rules, in which everything was targeted for the old medical loan on the credit report on the credit report to the late fee from the bank overdraft fee and credit card. .
If the Democrats performed better in the elections, some rules could have been effective so far. As it stands, the consumer agency itself is limited.
The new President Donald Trump fired CFPB director Rohit Chopra and established a acting director, Russell Wout, who ordered the agency to stop its work and close its doors.
Elon Musk, the billionaire worked with reducing the budget of the beltway, broadcast Trump’s clear intentions, and on his own, in 7 tweets in 7 tweets, in which read, “CFPB RIP,” with a Tombstone Emoji .
Trump has nominated Jonathan McKerinan as a former federal deposit insurance corporation board member, as a new permanent head of the consumer watchdog group. But it remains to be seen what kind of agency McKernean can inherit.
Need a little rest? Play USA daily crossword puzzles today.
Most CFPB initiative has a clear consumer appeal: Credit Card Customers will probably welcome a late payment fee. But the financial industry has filed a lawsuit to block several rules, saying that they can actually do more harm than the best. For example, a hat on overdraft fees, may motivate a bank to prevent customers’ safety against overdraft.
“You have to think in a way or in some other way, these things will increase before the Supreme Court,” said Mark Hamric, senior economic analyst of the individual finance site.
Particular politics can determine the future of CFPB
The partisan politics can shape the future of the agency.
Formed after the 2008 financial crisis, CFPB was modernized on an idea of Massachusetts Democrat Sen Elizabeth Warren. Many agency initiatives have a popular appeal, saying consumer advocates. But especially from the Financial Industry and the Republican of the Congress, a stable drumbet of criticism suggests that the agency has crossed its mandate.
“We are hoping that these are roughly popular measures, that Republicans would understand that their voters do not want banks to gauze them with excessive, back-end overdraft fees,” in other allegations, Associate Director of National Consumer Lauren Saunders said. Law center, non -profit consumer advocacy group. “We are expecting, but who knows.”
With the fate of CFPB in the air, the agency’s most high-profile recent functions, for them and their status in the new Trump administration, are a group of status.
Credit card late fee
A rule was announced in March 2024, which faced late fees on credit cards for the largest card companies at $ 8. The specific late fee is around $ 30.
Argument for: Regulators said that late fees were unnecessarily higher. He predicted that the cap would save US families more than $ 14 billion per year.
Argument against: Industry leaders stated that CAP can trigger high interest rates that can increase the cost of credit for customers who pay their bills on time.
Where it stands: Rules were made effective in May 2024. But litigation ensured this, and those who monitor the industry estimate that the case can go against CFPB.
Bank overdraft fee
CFPB capted most of the bank overdraft fees at $ 5 in a rule announced in December. The fees have been around $ 27 on average.
Argument for: The agency said that overdraft fees, like late fees, are unnecessarily high. Caping them can save a house with $ 5 billion per year, or $ 225 per fee-paying house.
Logic against: Industry leaders say the rules may be backfire on weak customers, who rely on overdraft protection to stay solvent.
Where it stands: Rules were to be effective in October 2025. But Republican MPs have introduced a law to reversed it, and they control both the houses of the Congress. The financial industry has filed a lawsuit to prevent the rule.
Medical loan on credit report
In January, CFPB banned the inclusion of a medical bill on the credit report, so medical loans would not be against consumers who try to take loans.
Arguments for: Regulators say that unpaid medical bills are factors in hostage applications denied thousands, and that many medical loans are unfair.
Argument against: Industry leaders say that the rules will eventually harm consumers, those who can be issued loans are unable to repay.
Where it stands: Rules were to be effective in March. The financial industry filed a case, and a federal judge stopped it. The Trump administration also effectively fosters it along with other pending federal rules.
Regulation of digital payment app
In November, CFPB finalized a rule to monitor wide regulatory monitoring of large digital payments apps such as Google Pay and Venomo.
Arguments for: Regulators stated that payment applications are rapidly unsafe for fraud. Consumers sometimes lose access to their accounts without any notice.
Argument against: Financial technology companies have warned that rules will stop innovation and push startup out of business.
Where it stands: The rule was to be effective in January, but the new administration can choose not to take action on it. Financial take firms have filed a suit to block it. On Thursday, the House Republican said they intend to roll it back.
Control of personal financial data
In October, regulators announced a rule that gives consumers more control over their personal financial data.
Under the new rule, financial institutions must transfer the financial data of a consumer to another company at any cost at the request of the customer.
Argument for: CFPB said that the rules would make banks to be changed, low cost on loans and improve customer service.
Argument against: Banking leaders say that the rule is “complex, expensive, compulsory regulatory structure that the Congress never authorized.”
Where it stands: Rules were not effective for large banks until 1 April, 2026. The banking industry has filed a lawsuit to stop it.
