SpaceX CEO and unpounted White House advisor Elon Musk today unexpectedly stated that he wants the international space station to “as soon as possible” to be destroyed.
Today in a tweet, the mercurial entrepreneur said that it is “time to start preparing to cancel the space station,” arguing that “it has fulfilled its purpose, with” with “with” very little incremental utility “.
Instead, Musk argued, the station should be destroyed within two years – but the final decision left “for the President”.
This is a misleading statement that comes at an extremely inconsistent time. We can only guess why Musk wants to dig the existing plans to retire the orbital laboratory in 2030 – with the help of our space company, we should pay attention. But increasing the pressure to dig the ISS, the founder of billionaire Tech and the SpaceX Space Tourist Jered Issacman can convert into a large -scale headache, which for his confirmation in Washington, DC (a date has not yet been determined. ).
but as Tech technicaEric Berger’s report, the Congress of the Space Station, is the leading advocate, including Senator Ted Cruise (R-TX), who has historically supported the continuous operation of the station.
A source with knowledge of the case told Berger that the cruise was “fierce” with musk on the tweet. The Congress will look at the confirmation process of Isaacman on Commerce, Science and Transport as the chairman of the American Senate Committee. Those meetings can be thrown into chaos with musk, which now have huge effects in the White House, advocating the early retirement of the station.
Going ahead, Isaqman will have to walk tightly, To please an unexpected and extremely impressive musk while maintaining a good relationship on Capital Hill.
Why would Musk dump existing schemes to retire the space station? In his tweet, Musk renewed his call to “Go to Mars”, suggesting that the mercurial CEO wanted to shore money to send the spacecraft, and eventually sent humans to red planets .
NASA spends $ 4.1 billion at space station per year out of its $ 25.4 billion annual budget. The company’s dragons go to the spacex of the musc for almost half the muscles as part of their transport budget to distribute spacecraft and distribute it to astronauts from the station.
It is likely that receiving astronauts on the surface of Mars will cost more magnitude orders than that, as experts have suggested earlier – if this is also possible, it is that.
In addition to the possibility that Musk “is looking to save money to go to Mars,” his plan to destroy the space station soon may turn into a huge headache for NASA’s private partners as soon as The stations are trying to develop their own location, as Berger has suggested.
Those stations are unlikely to be launched soon at any time, which means that China will be the only nation in the world, which has a permanent presence in the Earth’s orbit for years if the ISS was to be assigned to the new time of Musk.
Cosherally, SpaceX had already signed a contract of about $ 1 billion with NASA to develop a “US decorbit vehicle”, which can remove the IS from its class and its burns to remain. Can push harmlessly in the sea.
In other words, it is not a large scale conflict of interest that is inspiring musk-it seems like a knee response in searching for Mars to reach Mars.
Both Musk and President Donald Trump have argued that we should target our places on Mars instead of Moon, those plans that can spend billions of NASA as it is forced to destroy its Artemis program.
The closure of NASA’s moon project can also prove to be very unpopular among the loyalists of Republican Trump in the Congress.
But will the MPs be said to be the last because the boys of Musk saw the federal government separately. So far, the Congress has appeared to a large extent reluctant or unable to stand in its way – which can make the magic of disaster for plans to keep the space station alive by 2030 for NASA plans.
More at the station: Elon Musk asked to destroy the space station at the earliest
