Prince Harry is facing serious allegations that can harm his reputation, especially about his role in Charity Santabel.
The organization, which he co-established in memory of his late mother, Princess Diana, is now at the center of controversy, with the claim that Duke preferred personal gain on his mission, as, as, as, as, as, as, as, Sun, Royal expert, Russell Myers.
Charity’s chair, Sophie Chandauka, has accused Harry of contributing to Sentabel’s struggles, alleging that his association has stopped sponsors due to his controversial public image.
In addition, reports suggest that Harry insisted on bringing a Netflix crew into his attractive million deals, which is compared to achieving the most beneficial arrangement for a money rally.
The Charity Commission of the UK is now investigating whether there was a mismanagement, although it may not directly address tension between Chandaka, Harry and Lesotho co-founder Prince Sissiso.
This increases the widespread concerns about Harry’s post-renewable identity. Once committed to the global service, he and Meghan argued that leaving the monarchy would not reduce their charitable effects.
However, these allegations depict a different painting-self-interests on philanthropy. If true, they can shake the belief of those who once praised their dedication for humanitarian work, questioning many people their real priorities.
